Alberta would need negotiated continuity or new institutions for defence, border enforcement, federal policing functions, emergency management, intelligence coordination, and critical infrastructure protection.inferencehigh risk
/ Claims and evidence
Who would defend Alberta, and what alliances or security arrangements would replace Canada’s?
Key claims used in this dossier, paired with the sources that support them. Claim status and risk labels come from the public claim ledger for this topic.
Alberta already has provincial public-safety and emergency-management responsibilities, which could provide a partial institutional base but not a complete national-security system.inferencemedium risk
Canada currently supplies national defence, border services, emergency-management coordination, and federal policing structures; replacing or renegotiating that stack would be a major transition task.inferencehigh risk
A lawful negotiated process would reduce security-continuity risk, while a unilateral or rushed transition would raise it.inferencehigh risk