Would bank deposits, credit-union savings, and financial backstops still be protected?

Key claims used in this dossier, paired with the sources that support them. Claim status and risk labels come from the public claim ledger for this topic.

001
Current sources establish a layered Canadian baseline: eligible deposits at CDIC member institutions are protected under federal deposit-insurance law and rules, federally regulated banks operate under the Bank Act and OSFI supervision, payment clearing is governed through Canadian payments legislation, and Alberta credit unions have a separate provincial guarantee and statutory framework.source supportedmedium risk
003
The strongest pro-independence case is conditional: Alberta could make depositor-protection continuity a first-order negotiation item, use the current Canadian and Alberta frameworks as a functional checklist, and legislate or fund successor arrangements before any legal transition affected account holders.inferencemedium risk
005
Public claims about protecting "savings" should distinguish insured deposits from uninsured or differently protected products, because CDIC and Alberta credit-union coverage are category-specific and CIPF coverage is for eligible client property at investment dealers, not a general bank-deposit guarantee.source supportedmedium risk