/ Source

Charter of the United Nations — Full Text

Primary international-law instrument referring to equal rights and self-determination of peoples.

Last evidence check means this project’s automated public-repository check; it is not a government audit, regulator audit, external audit, or assurance engagement.

United NationsofficialLast evidence check 2026-05-06Accessed 2026-05-06Open original Back to source library

Source statusUnited Nations source record checked 2026-05-06

Review trailSource usage is tied to public topics and claim records in the repository.

Source typeofficial

Topics using source3

Claims referenced2

Why this source matters

Provides international-law context for self-determination arguments, read through the Supreme Court's conclusion that international law did not give Quebec a unilateral secession right in the circumstances before it. This record currently supports 3 topics and 2 claims in the public repository.

Evidence details

This source row records the publisher, source type, reliability label, access date, original URL, and any archive copy available to this project.

Used by topics

001What did the Supreme Court actually say about unilateral secession?The Supreme Court rejected unilateral provincial secession and described when a duty to negotiate may arise.

002What would legally need to happen for Alberta to become independent?A clear Alberta vote could create democratic force and a duty to negotiate, but it would not by itself create independence; the hard legal fight is clarity, negotiation, treaty rights, and implementation.

003Would other countries recognize an independent Alberta, and what conditions might they attach?International recognition would be influenced by legality, negotiations, political support, and diplomatic choices.

Referenced claims

001quebec-secession-referenceInternational self-determination instruments support why self-determination arguments arise, but the Supreme Court concluded international law did not give Quebec a unilateral right to secede in the circumstances before it.

002international-recognitionInternational recognition would be more plausible after a lawful, negotiated, clearly democratic process with credible transition terms.