/ Source

Actuarial Report (32nd) on the Canada Pension Plan

Chief Actuary actuarial valuation of the Canada Pension Plan, including long-term financial projections and contribution-rate sustainability analysis.

Last evidence check means this project’s automated public-repository check; it is not a government audit, regulator audit, external audit, or assurance engagement.

Office of the Superintendent of Financial InstitutionsofficialLast evidence check 2026-05-06Accessed 2026-05-06Open original Back to source library

Source statusOffice of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions source record checked 2026-05-06

Review trailSource usage is tied to public topics and claim records in the repository.

Source typeofficial

Topics using source1

Claims referenced3

Why this source matters

Baseline for CPP sustainability, actuarial uncertainty, and why any Alberta alternative needs transparent actuarial assumptions. This record currently supports 1 topic and 3 claims in the public repository.

Evidence details

This source row records the publisher, source type, reliability label, access date, original URL, and any archive copy available to this project.

Used by topics

001Would Albertans keep CPP benefits, or move to a new pension system?CPP withdrawal has a statutory path, but transfer amount, timing, and independence-related pension treatment remain materially uncertain.

Referenced claims

001cpp-pensionsCPP sustainability and contribution-rate claims should be checked against Chief Actuary reporting rather than inferred only from Alberta demographics or political preference.

002cpp-pensionsThe strongest anti-independence or pro-federation pension argument is that pension security depends on continuity, actuarial credibility, payroll administration, investment governance, and negotiated legal terms that current sources do not yet settle for a separate Alberta system.

003cpp-pensionsCurrent checked sources do not prove that Albertans would automatically receive lower contributions, higher benefits, better investment returns, identical CPP continuity, or worse pension outcomes under a separate Alberta pension arrangement.